But why this doomsday attitude over a little bit of testing you ask? Well, let me unleash the inner nerd to break it down for you, policy style.
A little background info, first, shall we?
So there's this little thing called No Child Left Behind. As part of this, every child in the U.S. must meet/pass individual states' standardized assessments by the year 2014. Each state has interpreted this law and set forth a plan to reach this goal. For the state I am in, each year since 2002 the requirement of students passing reading and math assessments has increased incrementally by 10% every two years. This percentage of growth year-to-year is called Adequate Yearly Progress, affectionately nick-named AYP.
Now, when I say passing, I mean the state looks at several areas and each area must meet the percentage of students passing each assessment. They look at attendance first, then participation (we must have at least 95% of students take each assessment), and finally cut scores (what meets and does not meet). Within each school, they look at many different groups and each group must meet these percentages. They look at each school as a whole, and then break it down into subgroups. Under NCLB, subgroups include major racial/ethnic groups, Limited English Proficient, economically disadvantaged, and students with disabilities.
Many of my students are what we call a "trifecta" student, meaning they fall into our major ethnic group, LEP, and SPED subgroups. This means their score doesn't just affect one subgroup, it affects all the subgroups they are in. So, when a school does not meet the percentage laid out by the state, either as a whole or in one subgroup for one subject area, they are penalized (I should clarify, only Title I schools, which are schools that receive money from the federal government for assistance due to having a certain percentage of economically disadvantaged families, are penalized, while every school statewide is monitored).
If a school does not meet the yearly percentage, they are placed onto a watch list. At the end of the second year on the watch list, if they still have not met the expected percentage in all subgroups, they are placed into sanctions, which increase in severity for each year the percentage passing is not met.
My school is currently in year four sanctions. During year three, we received extra funding from the state to implement programs to support our subgroups that did not meet (which were SPED and LEP), as well as state and district staff coming in to support administrators and teachers. Because of this support (and the teachers busting their asses), we met AYP for that year (HAPPY HAPPY DAY!!!). However, schools in sanctions must meet AYP two years in a row to pull out of sanctions.
So, this year the pressure was on. I had to get 70% of my students taking the reading and math assessments to pass, or at least a specific percentage of growth known as Safe Harbor. Last year, my percents in the SPED subgroup, as determined through a very complicated formula that no one seems to really know, were 72% passing reading and 67% passing math (which, due to Safe Harbor, meant we passed that area).
But alas, this year the pressure seamed to be too much for my totally awesome kids. We busted our butts (and our brains) to get them over that bar they set so high last year. A majority of those who passed last year did so again, thankfully. Sadly, though, many of my students did not pass, and for a slew of reasons, with the main one remaining at they are students with learning disabilities.
While we improved in math, the area I was most concerned about, we slid backwards in reading significantly. My predicted percentages are reading- 48% and math-68%. So, it is with a heavy heart that I must admit, short of a miracle in mathematical formulas that only the state has, we will not be passing year four AYP, thus remaining in sanctions. Of course, news of whether we actually meet AYP will not come until mid-August. But until then, I'll put on a good face for my kids, while really, deep down inside I am heart broken that I couldn't have done more for them.
On that note, let's start planning for next year!
If you are interested in learning more about AYP, check out this site and look at the AYP Key Points, unless of course policy is your thing, then you should check out the technical manual.